Requesting Integration of External Apps (LTI's) in ISU Canvas

Description

This article provides instructions on how to request an LMS Integration of External Apps in ISU Canvas  at Idaho State University (ISU).
 
Learning Tools Interoperability (LTI) is a standard created by the IMS Global Learning Consortium (external link) . An LTI shares content, resources, and/or other information from a third-party website with a learning management system (LMS). Its primary purpose is to connect learning systems with external services. Canvas calls these integrated platforms "external apps".

Guide Navigation

LTI Integration Requirements

All external applications must complete institutional review before being added to ISU Canvas.

Required review areas

  • Vendor Risk Review
  • Accessibility Review
  • Customer Support Review
  • ISU Systems Impact Review

Required LTI Standard

  • New LTI integrations must comply with the LTI version 1.3 standard.

Not permitted

Support levels for external applications

Site-Supported Apps

Site-supported apps are:

  • Paid for by ISU
  • Supported by ISU
  • Available institution-wide

Faculty support is typically provided through the ITRC.


Course or Department-Level Apps

Course and department-level apps are:

  • Paid for by individual departments
  • Supported by the requesting department or vendor

Warning: Faculty are not permitted to independently install course-level LTI integrations in ISU Canvas.

↑ Back to Top

Requesting installation of a new external app

Request Form

Review Timeline

  • Each department/course-level integration request will be reviewed based on risk, accessibility, support, and impact on ISU systems. If an integration does not meet ISU expectations in any one of these areas, the request will be rejected.
  • Integration reviews take at least 4 weeks from the time the request is submitted but may be extended due to vendor delays or peak academic periods (start of term, midterms, finals, etc.)

Required vendor documentation

  • HECVAT or SOC 2 report
  • Security policy
  • Privacy policy
  • VPAT
  • Accessibility policy (if available)
  • Support documentation
  • Vendor contact information
  • System status page (if available)

Required institutional details

  • Estimated users (faculty, students, courses)
  • Functionality description
  • Implementation time line
  • Costs
  • Responsible department

↑ Back to Top

Vendor Risk Review

Requirements

  • Requestors must obtain one of the following from the vendor:
    • HECVAT
    • SOC2  from the vendor.
  • Note: If neither document is available, the request will be rejected.

What these evaluate

  • Information security
  • Cybersecurity controls
  • Data privacy
  • Protection of personally identifiable information (PII)
  • System availability and integrity

Optional Documents

In addition to the required documentation, vendors are encouraged to provide:

  • Privacy Policy or Statement: Relays any rights users have on the platform to control their personal information.
  • Security Policy or Statement: A public information page that relays the vendor’s ability to protect sensitive data and other information during interactions on their platform.

Accessibility Review

Vendors must provide a VPAT. Note: If a VPAT is not provided, the request will be rejected.

Optional: Accessibility Policy or Statement: A public information page that relays the vendor’s internal organizational policies, accessibility goals, and past successes when it comes to serving and working with people who have disabilities.

Accessibility Compliance

More Information

Customer Support Review

Required vendor information: 

  • Support documentation or help site that includes step-by-step guides or knowledge base articles.
  • Customer Service Contact information
  • Vendor representative contact 
  • [Optional] A Status page is a communication platform where users can subscribe to receive notifications about incidents or outages, eliminating the need to contact support for updates.

Optional Documentation

Vendors are encouraged to provide:

  • System status page
  • Outage notification services

Warning: While ISU enables many integrations of 3rd-party tools with the Learning Management System (LMS), ISU does not assume the support role for all external tools. Refer to the approved integrations table for support responsibilities. 

↑ Back to Top

ISU Systems Impact Review

Requestors must provide: 

  • Expected number of faculty users
  • Expected number of student users
  • Expected number of courses to use the app
  • Desired implementation date
  • Costs to students or ISU

Evaluation considerations

ISU staff will assess:

  • Integration type (LTI 1.3 preferred)
  • Compatibility with ISU Canvas features (assignments, navigation, deep linking, etc.)
  • Duplication of existing tools or functionality

Unsupported for new requests

  • LTI 1.1 integrations

Approved Integrations

Institution Supported Applications

  • Atomic
    • LTI Version: 1.3
    • Status: Available
  • Canvas Attendance (Roll Call)
    • LTI Version: 1.1
    • Status: Available
  • Canvas Badges
    • LTI Version: 1.3
    • Status: Available
  • Canvas Commons
    • LTI Version: 1.1
    • Status: Available
  • Canvas Quizzes 2
    • LTI Version: 1.1
    • Status: Available
  • CIDI Labs
    • LTI Version: 1.3
    • Status: Available
  • Google Assignments
    • LTI Version: 1.3
    • Status: Available
  • Panopto
    • LTI Version: 1.3
    • Status: Available
  • Tutor.com
    • LTI Version: 1.1
    • Status: Available
  • Turnitin
    • LTI Version: 1.3
    • Status: Available
  • Zoom
    • LTI Version: 1.3
    • Status: Available

Support for these tools are generally provided by the ITRC.

Course and Department-level Applications

Examples of approved department-level applications include:

  • Access Pearson
  • Aktiv
  • Auralia / Musition
  • Cengage
  • Edfinity
  • Edpuzzle
  • Elsevier Evolve
  • ExamSoft
  • Feedback Fruits
  • GoReact
  • Labster
  • Macmillan Achieve
  • McGraw Hill Connect
  • Packback
  • Perusall
  • Sage Vantage
  • Stukent
  • Top Hat
  • W. W. Norton
  • Wolters Kluwer Lippincott

Support for these tools is generally provided directly by the vendor.

↑ Back to Top

Integrations under review

The following integrations are currently under review.

  • CourseKata
    • LTI Version: 1.3
    • Status: Evaluation in Progress
  • Runestone
    • LTI Version: 1.3
    • Status: Evaluation in Progress

↑ Back to Top

Additional Information

All approved integrations are periodically reviewed for:

  • Accessibility compliance
  • Security standards
  • Vendor support quality
  • Canvas compatibility

For questions about Canvas LTI integrations, contact: